Piscataquis County, ME

Supports B1-a Hazards

15 of the 18 National Risk Index hazards apply here; omission evidence is shown only where NRI rates a hazard "Not Applicable", no federal declaration names it and Storm Events has no record of it since 1996.

Highest expected annual loss (NRI, modeled): Cold Wave, Inland Flooding and Ice Storm.

Also check locally (not covered by NRI): dam failure (incl. upstream dams), levee failure, flash flood as its own subtype, ice jams, debris flows, erosion (riverine and coastal), land subsidence and sinkholes and expansive soils.

Check your state hazard mitigation plan's hazard list for this county; explain any hazard you drop.

Supports B1-b Location

• Avalanche, Coastal Flooding, Earthquake, Hurricane, Landslide, Tornado, Tsunami, Volcanic Activity and Wildfire: Census tract rating counts from the National Risk Index tract table (see B1-f). Tract maps and place names are not in this packet.
• Cold Wave, Drought, Hail, Heat Wave, Ice Storm, Lightning, Strong Wind and Winter Weather: Affects the whole planning area; national data do not distinguish locations within the county. Confirm locally.
• Inland Flooding: The FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) is the required location source for flooding. See the FEMA Flood Map Service Center (https://msc.fema.gov) for this county.

Supports B1-c Extent

Storm Events records for 12 of 20 hazard groups, with the scale, observed range and worst recorded event for each; the others say local data required.

• Hail: 2 in hail, 2023-08-13
• Thunderstorm Wind: 65 kt (75 mph) estimated gust, Thunderstorm Wind, 2013-07-19
• Tornado: F1 tornado, 1975-07-25, 1.8 mi path length (records before 1996 may include the whole path; rating and listing come from the county where the tornado began), 300 yd wide, $25,000 property; crops not recorded (1975 dollars)

Supports B1-d Previous occurrences

25 federal declaration rows for this area (23 counted incidents), each with type, dates and county Public Assistance dollars.

New since the last plan (approved 2023-03-31): DR-4754-ME and EM-3598-ME.

1 statewide declaration listed separately.

Hazards with no recorded events are stated as such (4 of 18).

Storm Events history: 816 records (notable ones in the PDF, all of them in the Excel file).

Supports B1-e Probability

FEMA annualized frequency (modeled) for each hazard, with a descriptor from a scale defined in the packet.

• Highly likely: Landslide, Lightning and Winter Weather
• Likely: Cold Wave, Drought, Hail, Heat Wave, Ice Storm, Inland Flooding, Strong Wind and Tornado
• Possible: Avalanche and Hurricane

Historical frequency by intensity band (tornado, hail, wind): 9 bands from Storm Events.

Supports B1-f Variation across the planning area

Range of census tract risk scores within the area for 18 hazards (8 tracts; rated tracts only).

16 member jurisdictions: plan clock, repeat-flood count, Public Assistance dollars and event records naming the place (starter, confirm locally).

Supports B2-a, B2-b Assets and impacts

Local data required

County-level starter. The plan must describe impacts for each participant and its own assets.

Storm Events damage since 2023-03-31: $0 in county-coded records (36 records); $0 reported for the zone (78 zone records). Data through 2026-06-30; nominal dollars.

Checklist of what to gather locally: Critical facilities and lifelines per hazard; A problem statement per participant per hazard; Changes in development in hazard-prone areas since the last approval, or a statement of none (E1-a); Future assets.

Supports B2-a Context

Population 16,735; building value $4,920,153,229 and agriculture value $11,731,301 (total, not at risk).

National Risk Index rating Relatively Low; social vulnerability Relatively Moderate; community resilience Relatively High.

Supports B2-c Repetitive loss

Repetitive-loss properties, FMA definition (44 CFR 77.2): 0 repetitive loss, 0 severe repetitive loss. NFIP insurance definition: 6 and 0.

Mitigated 0; insured 0; NFIP data as of 2026-08-02. Counts by occupancy and for each member community are in the packet.